Effectiveness of Hand Line and Kite Line Fishing Gear in Tuna (Thunnus sp.) Fisheries in Makbon Waters, Sorong Regency

Authors

  • Jamaluddin Fitra Dasi Program Studi Perikanan, Universitas Kristen Papua Sorong, Jl.F. Kalasuat Sorong 94512, Papua Barat, Indonesia
  • Roger R. Tabalessy Fakultas Pertanian, Program Studi Perikanan, Universitas Kristen Papua, Jl. F. Kalasuat Sorong, 94512, Papua Barat Daya, Indonesia
  • Melisa Masengi Fakultas Pertanian, Program Studi Perikanan, Universitas Kristen Papua, Jl. F. Kalasuat Sorong, 94512, Papua Barat Daya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56942/g2g4ct17

Keywords:

fishing gear effectiveness, hand line, kite line, tuna (Thunnus sp.), sustainable fisheries

Abstract

Large pelagic tuna (Thunnus sp.) is a high-value fishery resource that significantly contributes to Indonesia’s fishing industry. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two primary fishing gear types—hand line and kite line—in tuna fisheries in Makbon waters, Sorong Regency, West Papua. Field research was conducted using a survey approach with direct observations on 14 fishing trips. Results demonstrated that hand line yielded 52 tuna individuals (65.8% effectiveness), while kite line yielded 27 individuals (34.2% effectiveness). This difference is significant and influenced by technical factors including operational depth, gear selectivity, and target fish behavior. Hand line effectively reaches optimal tuna depths and exhibits higher selectivity for catching marketable-sized individuals. This research emphasizes the importance of appropriate gear selection in enhancing catch productivity while maintaining tuna resource sustainability. Policy recommendations include regulating hand line use as the primary fishing gear and implementing monitoring systems to ensure the capture of adult fish

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Danial, A. R. Baroqi, Wildan, P. S. Timur, dan Syahrul. 2023. Composition of Tuna Catch Hand Line at the Fish Landing Base (FLB) Lonrae, Bone Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, 25(5): 696.

Jauharee, A. R., M. Capello, M. Simier, F. Forget, M. S. Adam, dan L. Dagorn. 2021. Tuna behaviour at anchored FADs inferred from Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) of pole-and-line tuna fishers in the Maldives. PLoS ONE, 16(7): e0254617.

Manjunathan, M., T. Ravikumar, S. Chandran, N. Neethiselvan, P. Jawahar, U. Arisekar, dan A. Karthy. 2023. Catch Efficiency and Economic Analysis for Traditional Fishing Gear (Troll Lines) Operated along the Coromandel and Gulf of Mannar Coasts (Southeast India). Journal of Coastal Research, 39(6): 1137–1145.

Nurdin, E., A. Mamun, M. F. A. Sondita, R. Yusfiandayani, M. Baskoro, dan Mahiswara. 2019. Keberadaan Madidihang (Thunnus albacares) di Sekitar Rumpon. JPPI, 25(1): 35–44.

Siahainenia, P. F., D. Bawole, dan W. Talakua. 2019. Efisiensi Teknis dan Ekonomi Perikanan Tuna Hand Line di Negeri Tial Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Papalele, 3(1): 1–9.

Siahainenia, S. R., R. Tawari, H. Haruna, J. Paillin, dan R. Dikromo. 2022. Penangkapan Tuna Madidihang (Thunnus albacares) dengan Pancing Ulur oleh Nelayan Kecamatan Amahai Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Patimura Scientific, 2022: 84–91.

Widodo, A., C. Wilcox, L. Sadiyah, F. Satria, Wudianto, J. L. Ford, dan B. D. Hardesty. 2023. Developing indicators to detect the use of fish-aggregating devices. Marine and Freshwater Research, 74(3): 055.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Effectiveness of Hand Line and Kite Line Fishing Gear in Tuna (Thunnus sp.) Fisheries in Makbon Waters, Sorong Regency. (2026). INTEGRATED OF FISHERIES SCIENCE, 4(2), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.56942/g2g4ct17

Most read articles by the same author(s)